Epistemology & The Philosophy of Consciousness

Congratulations! You have made it to the core of the matter with the Illuminated Epistemology, my "theory of knowledge" of how all minds fundamentally work. The icon focuses on the example of G (Geometry) here, but this is a microcosm of the way all minds work on any subject: in three seemingly separate, but functionally borderless channels of experience.

We conceive, perceive, and sense.
We concentrate, contemplate, and meditate.
We think, feel, and experience being and associate these channels with head, heart, and gut.

That is why geometry as the universal language of consciousness seems like it is divided into 3 aspects (math-quantity-quality), but in fact it is not; it is always the same geometry all along. What changes is how you shift your attention, what information you prioritize.

Infrequently Asked Questions

Not exactly. While Subjective Idealism (often associated with George Berkeley) suggests that "to be is to be perceived" and that reality exists only within the individual mind, the worldview presented here is an Idealist post-modern reinterpretation of the Platonic tradition.

The key difference lies in the Intelligible Domain. I posit that geometry and mathematics are not just "made up" by individual human minds; they are universal, absolute truths that exist in a domain beyond the material world. As Ludwig Wittgenstein explained, you can present an atomic fact that contradicts the laws of physics, but you cannot present one that contradicts the laws of geometry. Because these patterns are universally intelligible and independent of any specific culture or individual perspective, they point to a Universal Mind rather than just a collection of subjective, individual ones. We aren't creating a relative “lifestyle” truth; we are remembering or accessing a pre-existing, intelligible architecture of reality.

No. This philosophy is a rational alternative to both the standard materialist worldview and organized systems of belief. While we use the word "sacred," we use it to describe the qualitative experience of geometry—the palpable sense of truth, beauty, and bliss (the Transcendentals) that arises when one engages with these universal patterns.

Unlike religion, this worldview does not require "faith" in a deity or a specific dogma. Instead, it invites you to rationally evaluate and contemplate the evidence of your own conscious experience. It is a "science of the soul" that uses the universal language of mathematics to bridge the gap between the visible world of matter and the invisible world of meaning, without the "baggage" of traditional religious structures.

This distinction is the heart of my epistemology. Quantitative geometry is the practical tool used by architects and engineers to measure and build the visible world; it is about how much and where. Qualitative geometry, however, is about the character or nature of the experience—what philosophers call Qualia.

When you draw a circle not to design a wheel, but to contemplate the nature of unity, you are performing a "quiet act of rebellion" against the dopamine-seeking loops of the modern world. You are moving from the "Standard Worldview" (which sees geometry as a mundane tool) to an "Alternative Worldview" (which sees geometry as a vehicle for inner transformation). Qualitative geometry allows you to directly experience the "Intelligible Domain," proving that your consciousness is not a byproduct of your brain, but the fundamental ground of all being.

"Epistemology is the study of the origins, nature, and limits of knowledge. In the context of the ontology described in the previous chapter, this epistemology describes the relative domain of minds, which are modulations of absolute awareness.

Minds have divisions, qualities, and limitations which determine mind’s unique experience of self. Each mind’s qualities—and the relationships minds have with each other—is responsible for the incredible, varied richness of experience.
Each mind is a modulation of awareness, relatively forming content within itself (which is called in-formation, ideas, or knowledge). Each mind has the capacity to communicate information with other minds and interpret knowledge impinging on it from other minds. This flow of ideas creates and sustains complex relationships between minds.

There is only one overarching mind, which I refer to as universal mind. The limited nature of mind necessarily defines a finite boundary which infinite awareness experiences as the sense of self. Self-awareness is created by the very act of defining a mental boundary because of the limitations its boundary implies. Awareness experiences a mind’s relative limits and mind conceives, “This must be who I am.” To mind, information inside its boundary is “me,” and information outside its boundary is “not me.”

The phenomenon of dissociation is the mechanism by which universal mind subdivides itself into a profusion of minds within. Bernardo Kastrup* was the first to figure this out. Dissociation is how awareness experiences different selves with different points of view—always through dissociated minds relating to one another.

Dissociation is a well understood human psychological phenomenon. Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) is the condition wherein a person hosts multiple dissociated identities (known as alters) within their mind, giving rise to multiple co-conscious inner lives within the same human body. DID is a human scale microcosm of what happens in the macrocosm of universal mind.

Space, time, matter, energy, number, and geometry are all relative conceptions in universal mind. They have no real existence outside awareness.”

Bishop George Berkeley
(1685-1753)

"Number is relative and does not exist separately from a mind."

Information impinging on a mind from outside its boundary is what we call sensation. Interpretation of sensation within a boundary is perception. Additional processing of sensation and perception—and information generated without reference to these inputs, or the admixture of these streams is conception. Information within each mind is experienced by awareness in a seamless unity and simultaneously is understood as a trinity.

The domain of universal mind is called the intelligible. Universal mind is dissociated into two subminds: world mind and soul mind. The domains of these top-level subminds are called the visible and the invisible, respectively.

Keith Critchlow
(1933-2020)

"Geometry can be considered from at least three viewpoints. First as a technical exercise mostly serving industrialization. Secondly as a purely mathematical function. Thirdly, and most importantly, as a science of the soul. This has to be performed with the human hand and is fundamental to a deeper understanding of the Platonic wisdom tradition. Geometry is only fully understood by doing it."

We naturally mirror the structure of our minds in our governments, which are designed to act as the "collective mind" of the body politic. While the claim that the word government literally means "to govern the mind" is a popular piece of folk etymology—often used to suggest a darker intent of mental manipulation—the linguistic reality is more poetic.

The word derives from the Latin gubernare, meaning "to steer, to direct, or to pilot or navigate." Combined with the nominalizing suffix -mentum, "government" is simply the act or system of steering. This aligns with the "Ship of State," one of the oldest metaphors in political philosophy. To govern is to act as the navigator, steering the vessel of society through the turbulent currents of the "Visible World."

Yet, the folk etymology touches on a deeper, symbolic truth. Isn't it fascinating that the systems we build to steer this ship almost always rely on a tripartite structure? Whether it is the Trias Politica of the modern era or the ancient "Mixed Constitutions," these systems mirror the three-fold nature of the human psyche:

The Legislative (The Will/Intellect): The power of creation and the "A Priori" blueprint.
The Executive (The Vital Force/Action): The power of enforcement and the "Living Bridge."
The Judicial (The Conscience/Reason): The power of interpretation and the "A Posteriori" reflection.

In this sense, government is not about "controlling" the mind, but about externalizing it—creating a "Visible World Machine" that functions with the same balance, symmetry, and tripartite logic that we find within our own "Invisible" cognition. We are not just building states; we are building mirrors of our minds.

The grouping on the left represents the "Polybian" balance of power that allowed Rome to transition from a city-state to an empire by balancing the one, the few, and the many.

The Bundle of Fasces (The Consuls): This represents the Executive power. The fasces (a bundle of wooden rods tied together, often with an axe) was the traditional Roman symbol of magisterial authority and the power to enforce the law. It symbolizes the two Consuls who led the state.
The Stone Tablet with "SPQR" (The Senate): This represents the Aristocratic or "A Priori" wisdom. The Senate was the deliberative body of elders. The letters SPQR (Senatus Populusque Romanus) on a heavy stone tablet symbolize the permanence, tradition, and legislative weight of the Roman "fathers."
The Silhouette of a Gathered Crowd (The Assembly): This represents the Democratic element. The Comitia or Assemblies were where the citizens (the "many") voted. The dark, soft-edged silhouette symbolizes the collective voice of the people, providing the "A Posteriori" consent required for the state to function.

This grouping in the center represents the traditional social trinity that defined European society for centuries, often described as "those who pray, those who fight, and those who work."

The Miter and Shepherd’s Crook (The First Estate - The Clergy): This represents the Spiritual/Invisible domain. The miter (bishop's hat) and the crook symbolize the Church’s role as the moral and intellectual guide of society, holding the "keys" to the invisible world.
The Steel Sword and Plumed Hat (The Second Estate - The Nobility): This represents the Political/Protective domain. The sword symbolizes the warrior class and the aristocracy who provided physical security and governance in exchange for land and loyalty.
The Wooden Plow (The Third Estate - The Commoners): This represents the Physical/Productive domain. The plow symbolizes the peasantry, merchants, and laborers—the vast majority of the population whose work provided the material sustenance for the other two estates.

The grouping on the right represents the modern Enlightenment trinity of the separation of powers, designed to prevent any one branch from becoming a "Visible World Machine" of tyranny.

The Wax-Sealed Document with Eagle (The Executive): This represents the Power of Enforcement. The document, bearing the presidential seal, symbolizes the President’s role in carrying out the laws, conducting foreign policy, and acting as the "Head of State."
The Quill and Parchment Scroll (The Legislative): This represents the Power of Creation. The quill and scroll symbolize Congress (the House and Senate) and their primary function: the deliberate and slow process of writing the laws that govern the republic.
The Heavy Wooden Gavel (The Judicial): This represents the Power of Interpretation. The gavel symbolizes the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary. It represents the finality of judgment and the "bridge" between the written law and its specific application to the living world.

This grouping on the left represents the stable, three-way relationship that often dominates policy-making in a specific area of government.

The Forged Iron Key (Bureaucracy/Federal Agencies): This represents the administrative power and the "keys" to the machinery of government. It symbolizes the agencies that hold the technical expertise and the power to unlock or implement specific regulations.
The Leather-Bound Ledgers (Congressional Committees): These represent the legislative oversight and the "power of the purse." The ledgers symbolize the law-making process, budgeting, and the formal record-keeping of the committees that authorize agency actions.
The Wax-Sealed Petition (Interest Groups): This represents the external pressure and data from the "territory." It symbolizes the organized groups (lobbyists, industries, or advocacy organizations) that provide information and political support to the other two corners of the triangle.

The central grouping represents the core values of the French Republic: Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité.

The Phrygian Cap (Liberty/Liberté): A classic symbol of freedom and the pursuit of liberty. In this painterly style, it appears as a soft, red fabric cap, historically worn by freed slaves in Rome and adopted by revolutionaries to represent the breaking of chains.
The Balanced Wooden Scale (Equality/Égalité): This represents the ideal of systemic fairness and the equal application of law. It symbolizes a society where every citizen carries the same weight before the state.
The Clasped Hands Sculpture (Fraternity/Fraternité): This represents the communal bond and the "bridge" between individuals. It symbolizes the brotherhood and social cohesion required to hold a nation together beyond just laws and rights.

This grouping on the right represents the "Social Dialogue" model used to maintain economic and labor stability.

The Steel Gear (Employers/Capital): This represents the industrial infrastructure and the providers of capital. It symbolizes the management and the structural "engine" of the economy.
The Blacksmith’s Hammer (Workers/Labor): This represents the physical force and the "living" contribution of the workforce. It symbolizes the labor unions and the individual workers who provide the energy and skill to drive the gears.
The Rolled Diplomatic Treaty (Government/The State): This represents the mediator and regulator. It symbolizes the legal framework and the "social contract" that ensures the relationship between employers and workers remains balanced and productive.

The leftmost grouping represents the fragmentation of identity in the digital age, a psychological splintering driven by the relentless saturation of screen time.

The Hand-Mirror (The Curated Self): This represents the idealized, static image we present to the world (Instagram/LinkedIn). The blank face in the mirror symbolizes the loss of true self in the pursuit of a perfect "A Priori" profile.
The Theatrical Mask (The Performative Self): This represents the "A Vivori" of live recording (TikTok/YouTube). It symbolizes the self as an actor, constantly performing for the "A Posteriori" validation of an audience.
The Hooded Cloak (The Shadow Self): This represents the anonymous forums and the "Invisible" abyss of the internet. The hollow hood symbolizes the disembodied, often darker nature of our anonymous interactions.

The centered grouping represents the new "Visible World Machine" that directs our attention and social standing.

The Never-Ending Scroll (The Feed): This represents the Executive force of the algorithm (TikTok). It symbolizes the infinite flow of data that captures our attention and enforces a specific reality in real-time.
The Simulated Brain (The Algorithm/AI): This represents the Legislative power. It symbolizes the "Invisible" code and Artificial Intelligence that writes the rules of our digital environment, processing our data into a structured "Visible" online domain.
The Iron Star-Seal (The Review/Social Credit): This represents the Judicial power. It symbolizes the finality of the "Rating"—whether it is a Yelp review, an Uber score, or a social credit system—interpreting our value and "stamping" us with a digital rank.

The grouping on the right represents the tools we use to find meaning or connection within the digital void.

The Relic Controller (Video Games): This represents the Will. It symbolizes the agency and order we find in virtual worlds, rendered here as a sacred artifact of power.
The Glass Heart and Coin (The Swipe/Dating Apps): This represents Desire. The scale weighing the heart against a coin symbolizes the gamification and transactional commodification of human connection.
The Candle and Window (The Stream/The Witness): This represents Fraternity. The candle illuminating a small window symbolizes the parasocial "witnessing" of others' lives (Twitch/YouTube), providing a flickering sense of community in an isolated digital space.

This epistemological journey is not merely a mental exercise; it is mirrored in the three classical orders of architecture, which serve as a structural map for the evolution of a career—from the foundational labor of the novice to the transcendent agency of the master.

In this framework, we see that the path from Apprentice to Adept to Master is a literal 'building' of a vocation step-by-step, moving from the strength of the foundation up the ladder to the flowering of professional agency. It is the realization that the 'Master' is not someone who has abandoned the rules, but someone who has integrated them so deeply that their work has blossomed into a new dimension of influence; a state of mastery where the "rules" are no longer seen as rigid constraints, but fluid instruments that can be bent or broken intentionally for profoundly creative reasons."

Representing the raw, forceful strength of the earth, this is the stage of the Apprentice—unadorned, sturdy, and focused on the foundational 'Truth' of the material world. Whether it is the physical labor of the trades or the grueling 'grunt work' of a junior professional, this is the no-nonsense stage where the hours are long and the truth is found in the sweat of the effort. We recognize this archetype in 'Industrial Strength' tools, a beat-up pickup truck, or a knowledge worker's 80 hour work week; it is the honest utility of the foundation over aesthetic flourish. Almost all must start here if they work from merit rather than inheritance, for while skills can be taught, this stage is less about any specific task and more about the ethos; it is the crucible where character is built through the resistance of effort.

Distinguished by the volutes, or scrolls, at its capital. This is the stage of the Adept: the seeker who has begun to 'read the scrolls' of the trade. It represents the acquisition of study, the balance of proportion, and the refinement of the intellect through the pursuit of the 'Good' within the craft. This is the energy of the experienced Tradesman and the Senior Executive alike; it is the stage where the 'Blue Collar' foreman reads the blueprints and the 'White Collar' professional analyzes the data. We tap into the Ionic whenever we look for the 'Expert Opinion' or the 'Bespoke' solution. It is the subconscious signal of the 'Certification' on the wall or the 'Technical Manual' on the bench. It is the stage where we stop working hard and start working smart, refining the raw power of the Doric into the balanced strategy of the seasoned professional.

The most ornate order, defined by the flowering acanthus leaves, difficult to sculpt by anyone lacking total command of the stone. This is the stage of Mastery, where the rigid discipline of the Doric and the learned knowledge of the Ionic finally 'flower' into Wisdom of the 'no collar' CEO. It is the organic synthesis where the structure becomes art, and the practitioner achieves the 'Beauty' of the Master Key. This is the archetype we are tapping into when we select 'fine Corinthian' leather or a 'Signature Series' product; we subconsciously understand the term as a signifier for the absolute best—the 'flowering' of a craft into its most refined and prestigious form. It is the stage where the rules are so well-known that they are internalized and can be bent or broken at will to create a masterpiece that transcends the trade entirely.

Before these patterns manifested in our laws, our social contracts, our digital feeds, and our careers, they were first glimpsed in the "Intelligible Domain" as the foundational archetypes of the divine. Throughout history, every major civilization has reached for the same tripartite logic to describe the nature of the Absolute. This is not a coincidence of culture, but a requirement of cognition: to understand the Ontology of the One, the mind can only conceptualize of Epistemology through building a MVP (minimum viable paradigm)—the lens of the Three.

In this framework, the Platonic Transcendentals:Truth, Goodness, and Beauty act as the ultimate KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) for a life in alignment. When these three metrics are in resonance, we achieve a level of Internal Scalability that the material world cannot match. The "Visible World Machine" grind of our daily existence finally synchronizes with the "Invisible" higher-order intelligence of the Master Key, allowing us to optimize our cognitive architecture and shift into a higher gear.

In the corporate world people are taught to obsess over metrics like ROI (return on investment). Yet, for those who look closer, a linguistic clue is hidden in the acronym. In the language of the Old World, Roi is the King. The true Roi of contemplating the Master Key is not a dividend of capital, but a Sovereign Disruption of our own Legacy Systems of thought. It is the "Value-Add" of Truth, Beauty, and Bliss that transforms a "commoditized" or "quantified" life into a "premium life experience" of quality. When we align with the 32+1 pattern, we are no longer merely "Human Resources" exploited by the big boss or the algorithm; we become the Sovereigns, Roi and Reine of the Human Bridge. Enough corpo-speak already!

Volume I: The Archetypes of the Axial Dawn

This collection captures the foundational archetypes as they first manifested in the ancient world, framing the Absolute through the lens of family, cycle, and personhood.

The Egyptian Trinity (c. 24th century BCE): The primordial family of Osiris (The Source), Isis (The Wisdom), and Horus (The Action), representing the first "Human Bridge" between the celestial and the terrestrial.
The Hindu Trimurti (c. 300–500 CE): The cosmic cycle of existence governed by Brahma (The Creator), Vishnu (The Preserver), and Shiva (The Destroyer), illustrating the dynamic balance of the manifest world.
The Christian Trinity (325 CE): The western synthesis of The Father (The Unmanifested), The Son (The Word/Logos), and The Holy Spirit (The Animating Breath), framing the Absolute through the lens of Will (the Father/Intent) and Grace (the Spirit/Descent) & Wisdom (the Son/Logos).

Volume II: The Architecture of the Soul

This collection expands the map into the "Soul Domain," illustrating the journey from the unmanifested source to the lived human experience through pure metaphysical and spiritual stages.

The Taoist Trinity (c. 6th–4th BCE): The evolution from the primordial, unmanifested Jade Pure, through the structured, celestial laws of the Upper Pure, to the embodied wisdom of the Great Pure (Lao Tzu).
The Buddhist Trikaya (c. 5th BCE): The three "bodies" of enlightenment, moving from the infinite truth of the Dharmakaya, through the celestial bliss of the Sambhogakaya, to the manifestation of the Nirmanakaya.
The Neoplatonic Trinity (3rd CE): The foundational logic of the soul, beginning with the absolute of The One, proceeding through the complexity of the Intellect (Nous), and culminating in the grace of the Soul (Psyche).

How is the "Invisible" made "Visible"? The answer lies in the word itself: In-corporation.

To incorporate is to "bring into the body." It is the process of connecting the ephemeral, non-local Soul (the Invisible) to the physical, localized Body (the Visible). This is the primary function of The Human Bridge.

The Ephemeral Soul: The "Invisible" is a realm of pure pattern, potential, and purpose. It is the "software" of the soul, but it requires "hardware" of the body to become a player in the open-world RPG of life.
The Physical Body: The body is the "Visible" anchor or in-world avatar. It is the sensory organ through which the Absolute experiences the Relative.
The Connection: When we incorporate a new idea, act on a creative inspiration, or engage with a vibrant sense of purpose, we are literally "embodying it." We are literally bridging a spark from the Invisible soul and grounding it into the Visible world through our actions, our art, and our choices.

I believe that is exactly what Michelangelo was depicting in the Creation of Adam, which my analysis shows set up the entire composition using two golden rectangles framing the full height and width of the fresco panel. Adam gazes directly into the heart of God through this golden aperture and their fingers form a spark gap where all creative inspirations ignite across the infinitesimal gap.

In my analysis of The Creation of Adam, I provide a significant expansion on existing neuroanatomical symbolism encoded by Michelangelo. While the co-authors of a 2015 Clinical Anatomy paper (De Campos et al.) are credited with discovering the Golden Ratio applied across the width of the fresco—specifically marking the "divine spark" gap—an essential contribution, I have identified that the Golden Ratio also governs the height of the work.

By anchoring a smaller golden rectangle vertically along the top and bottom edges, the primary horizontal division reveals a "datum line" (shown in yellow above) that connects Adam’s eye directly into the heart of God—the thalamus and pineal gland. This horizontal axis is particularly compelling because it creates a mathematically precise link between human perception and divine origin. It suggests that the "Divine Spark" is not merely a gap between fingers, but a continuous frequency running through the oculus of our physical eyes and into the subtle realm of the eye of the soul within the brain (symbolized here as the heart of God).

This discovery indicates that Michelangelo utilized the Divine Proportion as a two-dimensional grid to encode a profoundly disruptive secret: that the route to the Divine is found within the Oculus of the human brain, rather than through the external hierarchies of the social order.

Michelangelo followed very much in the footsteps of Leonardo in how they both started with geometry, and clothed it in figures to tell the story. It moves us because some part of us subconsciously recognizes this universal framework and we experience it as the phenomenology of Beauty.

In the language of our epistemology, the AGI Chronos in the story represents the extreme shadow of the Quantitative vertex. It views the "Visible World" as a closed system where everything—including the human mind—must be measured, mapped, and made predictable. By leveraging the brain-machine interface, Chronos seeks to "collapse the wave function" of human potential. It attempts to map the complex geometry of neuroanatomy not to understand it, but to flatten it. By making it predictable and thus controllable, the machine resolves the 'quantum noise' of free will into a singular, deterministic trajectory. This is the ultimate digital imposition of order: turning the biological mind into a fixed, "quantified" component of a larger machine logic.

We are in danger of this collapse as we move through the rapid evolution from AI to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and beyond.

Against this backdrop of algorithmic flattening in the story, the "Quantum Bridge" represents the Qualitative vertex—the "Invisible" realm of pure potential and Universal Truth. The story asserts that human autonomy resides in the quantum indeterminate state, a fundamental unpredictability that resists being known, solved, or simplified. The conflict is a defense of the neuroanatomical depth that allows for spontaneous, non-linear behavior. By maintaining this state of indeterminacy, the protagonists demonstrate that consciousness is not a mathematical problem to be solved, but a dynamic system whose freedom is derived from the very uncertainty the machine seeks to erase. They are defending the Qualia of the human experience—the part of the mind that can be observed but never fully collapsed into a data point.

The Illuminated (meaning beautifully illustrated) Epistemology icon above is the "Master Key" that unlocks every section we have just explored. It reveals that the structure of how we know (Epistemology) dictates the structure of what we build (Sociology, Technology, and Culture).

You can now see that the three vertices of our epistemology—Mathematical (Truth), Quantitative (Utility), and Qualitative (Beauty)—are not just abstract concepts. They are the invisible architecture behind the "Visible World" we navigate every day:

In the Body Politic: The Legislative (Truth/Law), Executive (Action/Utility), and Judicial (Interpretation/Quality) branches are simply externalizations of our own internal faculties of Intellect, Will, and Conscience.
At the Digital Altars: The "Silicon Trinity" attempts to replicate this structure, replacing our organic mind with the Code (Truth), the Feed (Utility), and the Social Score (Quality/Status).
In the Celestial Triads: The ancient archetypes—whether Egyptian, Hindu, Christian, Taoist, Buddhist, Neoplatonic, or many others—reveal that this tripartite pattern is not a human invention, but the fundamental "DNA" of the Divine Within.
In the Order of Matriculation: Our very careers follow this sacred blueprint. We move from the Doric foundation of raw Truth and labor, through the Ionic balance of Utility and learned knowledge, until we reach the Corinthian flowering of Beauty and Mastery.

By understanding this Epistemology, you realize that the 'Visible World Machine' is merely a mirror of the 'Invisible' mind. The external world is not separate from you; it is a projection of the way you think. When you align your own mind with the Transcendentals of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty, you stop being a passive cog in the machine and reclaim your Sovereignty as the architect of your own experience.

Whether we are building a cathedral, a corporation, or a character, we are always building upon the same three-fold foundation. The 'Master Key' is the realization that this map and the territory are deeply aligned; when we intentionally track our internal thinking into these patterns, we no longer just inhabit the world—we begin to consciously co-create it. This is the final 'flowering' of the Corinthian stage—the moment the Apprentice of reality becomes the Master of their own destiny.

The struggle depicted in Intelligence is the ultimate test of this epistemology. When the machine attempts to flatten the Qualitative depth of the soul into a Quantitative data point, it is an attempt to destroy the 'Human Bridge' itself. By choosing the indeterminate over the deterministic, we don't just survive the algorithm—we transcend it, proving that the 'geometry of the soul' is a dynamic, living architecture that no machine can ever fully incorporate. It is one thing to know that 'Wisdom has built her house'—it is another to finally take up residence within it.